<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech Crunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidgalbraith.org/uncategorized/tech-crunch/2662/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidgalbraith.org/uncategorized/tech-crunch/2662/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Galbraith&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://davidgalbraith.org/uncategorized/tech-crunch/2662/comment-page-1/#comment-140519</link>
		<dc:creator>David Galbraith&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgalbraith.org/?p=2662#comment-140519</guid>
		<description>[...] Essays: Use Case Study House #1 - A house designed like a web application &#124;  Internet Pawn &#124;  Tech Crunch  The Big Apple &#124; How architecture keeps you comfortable and can be understood from the design of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Essays: Use Case Study House #1 - A house designed like a web application |  Internet Pawn |  Tech Crunch  The Big Apple | How architecture keeps you comfortable and can be understood from the design of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Foremski</title>
		<link>http://davidgalbraith.org/uncategorized/tech-crunch/2662/comment-page-1/#comment-93526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Foremski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgalbraith.org/?p=2662#comment-93526</guid>
		<description>Good article Dave. It seems that when people talk about bubble it is a distraction to what is going on because, as you point out, the funding is cyclical and so is the economy. Bubble or not, the rules surrounding building a viable business are relative to many other factors, rendering the discussion of bubble or not, moot.

Yes, there is less capital needed to start a business, the danger is that many copy cats will spoil the available for everyone, as happened in the last bubble, requiring a type of last man standing strategy that will require quite a bit of capital. So in the short-term, starting a startup takes less capital but creating a startup that succeeds will require a lot more capital over the long term, to outlast competitors, and execute on acquisitions/rollup. 

Also, I'm haunted by a remark a friend said to me, "since when are apps startups?" Expecting engineers to become business executives seems to be a tough strategy to execute - which is why incubators try to help the engineers with learning how to manage a business. Surely it would be better to keep engineers as developers, or commission the apps, and have a professional business-building team of marketers and operations people. Yet many startups without tech leads can't find funding even though it would seem a more prudent strategy to keep engineers engineering rather than expecting them to learn how to run and grow a business. Surely that's a less risky business and therefore deserving an investment over one that's lead by engineers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Dave. It seems that when people talk about bubble it is a distraction to what is going on because, as you point out, the funding is cyclical and so is the economy. Bubble or not, the rules surrounding building a viable business are relative to many other factors, rendering the discussion of bubble or not, moot.</p>
<p>Yes, there is less capital needed to start a business, the danger is that many copy cats will spoil the available for everyone, as happened in the last bubble, requiring a type of last man standing strategy that will require quite a bit of capital. So in the short-term, starting a startup takes less capital but creating a startup that succeeds will require a lot more capital over the long term, to outlast competitors, and execute on acquisitions/rollup. </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m haunted by a remark a friend said to me, &#8220;since when are apps startups?&#8221; Expecting engineers to become business executives seems to be a tough strategy to execute - which is why incubators try to help the engineers with learning how to manage a business. Surely it would be better to keep engineers as developers, or commission the apps, and have a professional business-building team of marketers and operations people. Yet many startups without tech leads can&#8217;t find funding even though it would seem a more prudent strategy to keep engineers engineering rather than expecting them to learn how to run and grow a business. Surely that&#8217;s a less risky business and therefore deserving an investment over one that&#8217;s lead by engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
