“It was the year that the Large Hadron Collider was finally fired up — and then abruptly shut down — and 2008 also saw significant progress towards the detection of dark matter. Physicists got a little closer to making practical quantum computers and 2008 saw a few nifty inventions to harvest energy from human motion. US president elect Barack Obama made a few high-profile science nominations that could signal a change in the US government’s view of climate change. It was also a good year for Japanese physics, as three Japanese-born particle physicists won the Nobel Prize in Physics.”
Uncategorized
The headline sound like an exaggeration, but this is exactly what Paul Krugman has alleged today:
“$400 billion a year in waste, fraud and abuse.
But the costs of America’s Ponzi era surely went beyond the direct waste of dollars and cents.
At the crudest level, Wall Street’s ill-gotten gains corrupted and continue to corrupt politics”
Amazing.
Alexandra Penney, a 60 something, urbane, Manhattanite, former magazine editor, lost her life savings in the Madoff scheme. Her story is told here.
This is a tragedy, Penney has fallen a long way from a dizzying New York height and has contemplated suicide. She didn’t inherit her money, she fought hard for it as a single mother. She wrote a best selling book called How to Make Love to a Man, and now she has been royally screwed by one, Bernie Madoff.
She now faces not ruin, but having to move out of her Upper East Side apartment, selling her second home in West Palm Beach, getting rid of her Soho studio, using her reserve savings account, taking the subway for the first time in 30 years and ironing her 40 white shirts.
Its through the banal detail of ironing that within this story, an untold one surfaces, about Alexandra’s maid, Yolanda.
“She needs money. She sends it to her family in Colombia. I have more than affection for Yolanda, I love her as part of my family.”
Yolanda is presumably one of those invisible people that served at the party when times were good, but we don’t know much about her, because people like Yolanda don’t often feature in magazine profiles.
We hear from Alexandra that she will be let go. Sold off with the “high thread count sheets, old china, watches, jewelry, Hermes purses, and Louboutin shoes”, when the proceeds from these could perhaps have secured both Yolanda and her family’s future.
In doing so, this could have been a real triumph over adversity, it could have been Alexandar Penney’s finest hour, her redemption. But instead, like Madoff’s billions, she blew it.
I genuinely feel sorry for Alexandra, happiness and perceived calamity are relative. I would be devastated by a fall to the level that millions around the world struggle to live on, so it would be hypocritical to judge too harshly. But there is a difference between hard times and not enough to eat, and that is what people like Yolanda face. You cannot let them eat cake.
Poor Alexandra, poorer Yolanda.
Terre Natale is an exhibition at Jean Nouvel’s Cartier Foundation about people displaced by conflict and natural disasters, based on the work of Paul Virilio.
I am not a fan of Virilio (I am not a fan of anyone whose bio includes both of the words French and philosopher, to be honest) but this exhibition is both excellent and groundbreaking.
It includes a stupendous cylindrical projection of animated quantitative data representing the flow of displaced people, wordwide, in an environment designed by Diller Scoffidio + Renfro.
Michael Zick Doherty worked on the stunning graphics which were produced using the open source data visualization application, Processing.
The only problem with the animations, is that they are so beautiful and seductive that you have to consciously remember that what is being explained is a global tragedy. This is perhaps the sad but unavoidable result of the quasi-autistic nature of quantitative over qualitative.
A must read piece by Steven Novella on the dangerous, widespread acceptance of fraudulent and quack medicine, such as homeopathy (water) to the extent that this statement may seem controversial:
“Fifty years ago what passes today as CAM (Complementary and Alternative Medicine) was snake oil, fraud, folk medicine, and quackery. The promoters of dubious health claims were charlatans, quacks, and con artists. Somehow they managed to pull off the greatest con of all – a culture change in which fraud became a legitimate alternative to scientific medicine, the line between science and pseudoscience was deliberate blurred, regulations designed to protect the public from quackery were weakened or eliminated, and it became politically incorrect to defend scientific standards in medicine.”
After the collapse of the banking industry, deregulation is becoming a dirty word. Perhaps its time to fight back against the deregulation that allowed for alternative medicine? After all, this was a battle originally lost because of emotion rather than reason.
As Steven Novella puts it:
“Why hasn’t Ralph Nader noticed this? What if the auto industry promoted “automobile freedom” laws so that consumers could buy any vehicles they wanted, free from any government quality or safety regulation?”
Buried in this article about fad treatments for autism is the fact that the number of people diagnosed with autism has increased 20 times since the 70s.
Either we are better at diagnosing autism; there is an autism epidemic or we are falsely diagnosing children with autism.
Although extreme cases of autism prove that this is a serious a debilitating condition, I can’t help feeling its the latter and that both autism diagnosis and treatment are fads. The central role that autism has played in wrongful public hysteria over vaccination risks is perhaps due, in part, to the fact that autism diagnosis is a less than perfect science.
Advertising that taps the subconscious performs better. Link
The Ministry of Sound opened in London, in 1991, the first major nightclub without an alcohol license. It didn’t need one to be commercially viable, since the main intoxicant on offer was the then fashionable narcotic, ecstacy. People would buy water and soft drinks at inflated prices. This was common knowledge, and to suggest otherwise would be incredibly naive or deceitful. Today it is a $150M company with 120 employees and a legal team.
I am making no judgement about that, but its pretty ironic to see an interview with their ‘head of legal’, Victoria Davies, in The Lawyer. Of course we have seen this hybrid of party culture and what used to be conservative, elsewhere – in banking.
The man in the picture, could turn out to be the biggest civilian criminal ever and he used to be the chairman of the NASDAQ. Bernie Madoff has been arrested on charges of fraud totaling $50 billion, a Gordon Geckko-filled stadium’s worth of damage.
Investment returns were merely new capital invested handed to the previous investors. This is commonly called a Ponzi scheme, except that the eponymous Ponzi was small fry compared to Madoff (which is a much better term for making off with someone’s cash, anyway).
Many of the world’s most ‘prestigious’ investment firms, from banks like Santander to hedge funds like Nicola Horlick’s, Bramdean, were directly or indirectly taken in by what equates to a street scam. The fact that such a crude scheme worked reveals either a system wide endemic lack of due diligence or a don’t ask don’t tell culture regarding returns that looked like they may have been based insider information.
From the Madoff website:
The Owner’s Name is on the Door
In an era of faceless organizations owned by other equally faceless organizations, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC harks back to an earlier era in the financial world: The owner’s name is on the door. Clients know that Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining the unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm’s hallmark… Bernard L. Madoff has been a major figure in the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), the major self-regulatory organization for US broker/dealer firms. The firm was one of the five broker/dealers most closely involved in developing the NASDAQ Stock Market…Madoff was also a founding member of the board of directors of the International Securities Clearing Corporation in London
Can’t make this up.
Despite the attention grabbing headline, this article raises a simple and fair point that search brings results base upon links from people you don’t know, whereas Social Network search could return results your friends like.
There are actually three rather than two possible models on the Internet:
The Curations model: experts recommend.
The Search model: the crowd recommends.
The Social Network model: friends recommend.
Each will have its place and will be based upon the economics and availability of people producing the content people are looking for.
For example the Yellow Pages market will possibly fragment:
1. Curations: Zagats expert or Weblog writing key influencer model will work for high end restaurants and items you see in fashion magazines etc. (1 Zagats review of Nobu beats 100 Pizza eating teenage reviewers).
2. A Social Network will work for where trust is required (I’d rather trust my friends over a celebrity to recommend a Baby Minder).
3. The Search model for things like commodities based on price, such as where to buy Vacuum Cleaner (my friends might not know the best deal).
There will be overlap between the services and the types of things that they are useful for, but all three will survive as separate entities.
This list of the supposed 25 most valuable blogs aint worth a dime.
1. I know the actual numbers for a few of these properties, they are very different.
2. The list is note even close to complete – where are Treehugger, Popsugar etc. etc.
3. Alexa rank is largely irrelevant for these sites.
4. The multiple of CPM naively assumes all ad inventory is sold, this is never the case.
5. A five minute search will get you traffic numbers that are wildly different (remember the traffic numbers don’t tend to be secret because thats what publishers have to reveal to get advertisers). Drudge report under 10M page views per month? Absolutely clueless. This is out by a colossal factor of 50! Gawker actually publishes the live traffic stats through a third party and these are tracked in the same way as Quantcast so of course they are the same.
6. The operating margins are out by 30 – 40% for the properties I know.
In short, this list is put together by someone who does not know what a blog is, what the top blogs are, how they sell ads or what it costs to run them. In terms of making an effort to find out what he does not know, he has traffic stats that are less than 2% accurate for some, when the actual figures are published on the web by multiple verifiable sources and searchable within 10 seconds. If this were a high school project, it would be embarrassing.
Nice to see that our sites at Curations would come in the top 15 and our operating margins are higher than any here – even if they are wildly out.