“if a woman consents to extramarital sex, she is committing a moral offense which is equal to that committed by the man who engages in consensual sex with her, or by the man who, in the absence of such consent, rapes her. Christianity knows no hierarchy of sins. Since only the woman who is not entertaining the possibility of sex with a man and is subsequently raped can truly be considered a wholly innocent victim under this ethic”
I’ll paraphrase this nonsense because the writing is so bad:
‘A woman who considers, for a second, the possibility of sex outside of marriage is no better than a man who actually rapes her.’
This is what some people who call themselves Christians actually believe. As an aside, the guy who wrote the article describes himself as a Christian Libertarian (i.e. someone who both rejects and blindly worships authority).
Here are some other advertisers who appear on the Worldnet article, feel free to contact them, ditch their products or drain their bank accounts by clicking on some of their Google ads and not buying:
Netflix, Tickle, Shutterfly, Apartmentguide.