As the war begins, Nick Denton points out that the Reuters online coverage is much better than the Soft-Warnography being pumped out by the cable channels. I am already bored with CNN’s war jargon, sweeping platitudes, vapid pundits and pictures of silhouetted minarettes, but the problem I have with all the online sites is that there is no real sense of breaking news, without constantly hitting refresh like a laboratory animal in a Skinner box. Here’s what I would like: the top 100 online newspapers with dynamic loading of new headlines in near realtime. Amazingly this simple thing does not seem to exist in any of the news aggregator client interfaces.
admin
Increasingly I hear about people who are reading British newspapers because: 1. people can read news online and 2. British newspapers are in English. The Internet has ratcheted English up another notch as a lingua franca. In France, the preposterous Academie Francaise (think of the DMV run by philosophy professors) is fighting a losing battle against the rise of English. It creates mandated alternative words for things like ‘le Walkman’ (‘le Baladeur’), which nobody really uses and enforces laws which dictate that websites in France must not be only in English. Preservation of cultural diversity is a noble cause, but global heterogeneity does not stem from enforced regional homogeneity. i.e. instead of artificially propping up a language, how about promoting French culture and ideas? At this time more than ever it is important that France communicates its views to a wider audience – and on the web that means English…
Martin Amis had a character in a novel who was always smoking. In order to avoid having to write when the character lit a cigarette or drew a puff, he stated that the character was always smoking unless he stated otherwise. In order to avoid me writing or anyone having to read a huge tirade explaining my fickle view on the war, assume that I am in pefect agreement with whatever Richard Dawkins says. I’ll inform if otherwise. Dawkins’ post 911 article News about Dawkins The World of Richard Dawkins
The consumate diplomat, Bill Clinton vicariously supports the war by defending Blair. On the one hand too bad someone with his political skills isn’t in the White House. On the other, remember that operation Desert Fox, which had the undeclared aim of taking out Saddam, failed, leaving Clinton to stall over Iraq as the Lewinsky affair distracted both himself and the US. Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Bill Clinton: Trust Tony’s judgment
Tomorrow’s parliamentary vote in the UK will be a test of how much trouble Blair is in. The Independent has a handy guide to how to interpret the number of Blair’s own party voting against the government, my guess is around 125 will: “FEWER THAN 100 a relief for Mr Blair, who could claim the tide had turned his way since last month’s vote. MORE THAN 121 the biggest Commons rebellion by members of a governing party. 132 OR MORE a body blow to Mr Blair, as it would mean he could not command the support of more than half of Labour backbenchers. 173 OR MORE danger signals flashing for Mr Blair as, depending on the number of abstentions, he would have to rely on the votes of Tory MPs to win a Commons majority. Mr Blair could be in jeopardy if the war went badly. 206 OR MORE meltdown…
Blogrolling has opened up its own ping server, instead of reading Weblogs.com to alert updates. I think this is unfortunate, if ping servers become a Balkanized mess this will cause confusion. One solution may be to federate the Weblogs.com server much like DNS, i.e. have updates propagate through a network but have Weblogs.com become the top of the tree. I can’t see any objection to this since weblogs.com is open and allows xml access. The Weblogs.com ping server is potentially a crucially important piece of the web’s infrastructure. Blogrolling allows pings Update – Dave writes that Weblogs.com can indeed be federated.
Regarding Gulf War II: “The only debate in the U.S. media is on the Web, according to Jon Dennis, Guardian Unlimited deputy news editor. ‘Weblogs are doing all the work that the U.S. media did in the past,’ he said.” Poynter Online – E-Media Tidbits
Interesting article on content based advertising. Gil Elbaz of applied Semantics claims that “the very fact that search engine algorithms remain largely keyword-based means that they aren’t particularly sophisticated in learning what a page is “about.” I think this is optimistic. Google have the expertise to develop a concept based approach, possibly using intellectual property gained through their acquisition of Outride, but they certainly need to get their act together here or text ads advertising Hummers from suvssuck.com aren’t going to be that impressive. This is particularly important when you consider the following: “While clickthrough rates might indeed be lower, Google claims that their tests show that post-click behavior (conversions to sales) resulting from content-targeted ads is similar to that seen with search engine advertising.”
“You are holding your mother’s left hand. At the same time, she clutches her own mother, your grandmother, with her right. Your grandmother then holds her mother’s hand, and so on into the past. With each individual allocated a yard of private space, your ancestral queue snakes off into the Industrial Revolution, through the Middle Ages and on into prehistory, until, 300 miles down the line, it eventually reaches the missing link, the common ancestor that humans shared with chimpanzees six million years ago.” The Observer | Review | Dawkins versus the priests and New Age shamans? No contest
Here’s a prediction: someone will say something overtly political at tonight’s next week’s Oscars causing a huge outburst of feigned surprise. Here’s another prediction, if nobody says anything political tonight, calls of conspiracy and much thespian flapping will follow. It’s a bit like the celebrity Catch-22 below: “Daniel Day-Lewis, Best Actor nominee for ‘Gangs of New York,’ described the Catch-22 that celebrities find themselves in — as they are constantly quizzed by reporters about their political views. ‘The media are sick and tired of people in my profession giving their opinion, and yet you’re asking me my opinion,’ said Day-Lewis. ‘And when I give it you’ll say, ‘Why doesn’t he shut up?”” United Press International: Analysis: Is a Hollywood blacklist coming?
BBC GMR, Phil Wood Show: Wood: What ‘K’ could be described as the Islamic Bible? Contestant: Er… Wood: Its got two syllables… Kor… Contestant: Blimey? Wood: Ha ha ha ha no. The past participle of run… Contestant: (Silence) Wood: OK, try it another way. Today I run, yesterday I… Contestant: Walked? Private Eye Dumb Britain