Hungarian is the language of the future – and always will be. Top five technologies of the future – and they always will be: Speech recognition (weren’t we all supposed to have ditched our keyboards by now?) Virtual reality (whatever happened to VRML?) Smart cash (can you believe there are online services that write checks?) The Semantic Web (the pedantic web) Monorails (outside of Disneyworld, where are they?)
admin
The image above shows what the US search landscape looks like after recent consolidation. It is based upon a PDF document at Bruceclay.com There are 10 principal players out of the original 19, however in terms of supplying services and technology (the outbound arrows) there are only 5 companies: Google; Overture and Yahoo with AskJeeves and Looksmart trailing. 1. Google 2. Overture (+ FAST/Alltheweb, Altavista) 3. Yahoo (+Inktomi) 4. AskJeeves (+Teoma) 5. Looksmart 6. MSN 7. AOL (+Netscape, DMOZ) 8. Lycos (+Hotbot) 9. Iwon (+Excite) 10. Go
Currently in the Daypop Top 40: www.yournotme.com, shouldn’t this be www.yourenotme.com?
‘The paperless office is as useful as the paperless office’, so goes the saying. Since computers have become ubiquitous, paper consumption has actually increased. It always amazes me that banks and credit card companies have to store vast amounts of paper copies of transactions, that there is still no low cost EDI network and people still send paper invoices and purchase orders and that paper exists at all for anything other than luxury items such as books. Paper documents are often an inefficient, costly, dangerous anachronism and yet the pace of their replacement is business is seemingly glacial. Take architecture. The vast majority of litigation in architecture (and there is a vast amount of litigation – buildings are complicated and often leak etc.) stems from inconsistencies between contract documents. In the UK there are three principal documents, the plans themselves, the specifications and the bills of quantities. CAD software was…
At 12:34 on the 5th June 1978, I was in a Maths class at St. Johns School in Northwood, Middx. (12345678 – the day precedes the month, military style, in European date nomenclature). It was a hot day and the windows were open and the smell of newly mown grass wafted in from the playing fields. The maths teacher stopped the lesson and told us to remember the date and where we were – I did. Today is 03, 03, 03, I was alseep at three minutes past three this morning.
I’ve always thought that the disclaimer: “the personal opinions expressed here are mine not my employers” was tautological. For a weblog, this equates to: “the personal opinions on this personal opinion site are personal opinions not someone else’s opinions”. I may add that to my sidebar. Although more accurately it should read: “the personal opinions on this personal opinions site are rarely my personal opinion but more usually the result of a deeply immature desire to disagree with anything anyone says” Meg elaborates: A personal opinion – megnut.com
I have three types of possession: useful; sentimental/decorative (perhaps was useful) and might be useful or needed in the future. Items in the last category really, really bug me. A large proportion of the might be useful stuff could easily be online. Take for example product manuals or bank statements (my bank will only allow access going back a limited time). Today I threw out a shed load of product manuals for the various bits of near obsolete technology that I am continually acquiring – cos if I want to find out how to troubleshoot the thing gathering dust in the corner I can look it up on the web. Google is increasingly my virtual repository of ‘might be useful’. Amen
Info on Longhorn, Microsoft’s planned file system: Longhorn will finally allow you to search a single Windows machine with similar ease to the way you can already simultaneously search hundreds of thousands of other computers, via a web search. But, as Danny Ayers points out on RSS-dev, Longhorn is based on a relational file system, something which is perhaps obsolete for the purpose. An XML or even better, a graph based model would be more suitable. “Perhaps a little unimaginative of them to use a relational store (a graph model would be a better match for the networked computer environment IMHO), but I suppose they’ve already got the code. I guess at least it will mean that “Find File” will take days rather than months…”
This is huge– ok, perhaps overstating, but remember, search ads are a 1.5 billion dollar business and the following extends Google in the general ad space alongside companies like DoubleClick. The first signs of what the Google/Blogger combination will yield are shown with Google’s latest Adwords initiative. Google has just launched adverts which are based upon the content of a web page, for an example see the old Industry Standard website. This is a major new direction for Google since it extends their main revenue source from adverts on their own and affiliated search sites to any website. It also marks a trend away from the banner ad – in fact web advertising will increasingly consist of targeted text advertising and rich media adverts. The key to the targeted ads is that they change according to the content of the page (Google continually spiders the pages and serves different ads…
Jeff is disappointed that the THINK proposal did not win the WTC competition. Although innovative, there are two reasons why I believe the decision may be sound: 1. the project was very ambitious structurally and could have suffered dramatically from the effects of watering down the initial idea on grounds of cost and practicality. 2. THINK is a collaboration and could have suffered the perils of committee design. A great monument needs a great artist, a single minded signature designer with the resoluteness of a Frank Lloyd Wright. Libeskind has won and although his scheme looks more conventional at first glance, his past record will stand testament that this will be a fittingly triumphant project unlike anything else in Manhattan today. This will include the first deconstructionist skyscraper.
Don Park complains that metadata is being stuffed into the description tag. This was the original reason that a modular approach to RSS was necessary. What is needed is a simple, online, forms-based tool to create RSS modules. I guess I should have a go.