Another Bourgeois French Revolution

Posted by | globalization | No Comments

The French have a tradition of Bourgeois revolutions and this is no different. Young, predominantly white students, who are by definition not part of France’s growing underclass, are protesting to keep protections that benefit themselves. Trade unions have followed suit, since striking has become a national sport in France – you can’t beat a good strike. What is being proposed is an employment contract that means people don’t get the same job protections for their first job. The empirical results of removing benefits at the bottom of the ladder is that employers can take risks, and in a culture with sectors of society with long term unemployment this creates more of a hiring meritocracy. That is not to say that all benefits should be removed. It would be naive to think that, in a globalized economy, the bottom of the ladder is being filled according to the law. If you…

Read More

Sharia law is immoral – period.

Posted by | Uncategorized | No Comments

Ansarullah Mawlafizada, Afghan trial judge: "Islam is a religion of peace, tolerance, kindness and integrity. That is why we have told him if he regrets what he did, then we will forgive him," … and if not he will be murdered.link » tags: [religion] posted via Wists: permamark

Read More

Should Goodmail money go to the EFF

Posted by | technology | No Comments

Craig Newmark has a proposal to counter Goodmail. craigblog: a big advance for spam and phishing fighting? The problem with Craig’s proposal – that authorized, digitally signed email passes through spam filters – is that it doesn’t create a sender ‘cost’. This therefore cannot be a true cure against spam, since spam is a product of almost zero cost for the sender. As we are seeing, costs are always introduced in any marketplace, and with email being free to send, the self-emergent cost, in dealing with spam, is passed to the receiver. The postal service did not grow exponentially until it switched from a receiver to a sender pays model, and US cellphone use lags other developed nations because both call sender and recipients pay. If neither sender and recipient pay, as with email it seems that the recipient ends up paying. So the Goodmail solution plays into the way…

Read More